Home About Me
Start typing to search...
0%
0 min left

Published

5 min read

Deploying AI Agents in GTM: Lessons from the Trenches

img of Deploying AI Agents in GTM: Lessons from the Trenches

A practical guide to rolling out AI voice agents for go-to-market teams using low-code and no-code solutions_ Every GTM exec I talk to today wants AI agents yesterday. The promise of quick, plug-and-play automation is seductive. But most early deployments stumble. Not because of bad tech, but because the fundamentals get skipped.

Over the past year, I’ve been hands-on rolling out AI agents in our GTM world (using tools like n8n, make.com, Pipecat, and Vapi). What follows are lessons that will hopefully save you months of trial and error.

This is not a technical deep dive (plenty of those exist, like this or this). This is written for business leaders, folks like me the GTM folks trying to make AI useful now.

When we started, our goal was clear: deliver a smooth experience for customers while making life easier for our GTM teams by automating repetitive work, providing intelligent support, and boosting efficiency. Sounds simple. It wasn’t. Here’s what we learned.

Lesson 1: Workflows vs. Agents: Don’t Confuse the Two

My first mistake? Treating agents like chatbots on steroids. I dumped all requirements into one massive prompt and watched chaos unfold. As a fix, I started defining extremely tailored workflows that completely removed any agentic behavior. Of course, that simply reduced the agent to old-school IVR.

The fix was understanding the difference:

  • Agents = digital teammates with personalities, expertise, and limitations.
  • Workflows = the tracks that keep them on course. An agent might analyze a conversation and suggest next steps; a workflow ensures those leads land in Salesforce. Together, they deliver both efficiency and adaptability.

Takeaway: Without workflows, agents wander. Without agents, workflows lack intelligence. You need both._

Lesson 2: Prompts: Your First Ones Will Be Wrong

Clarity in prompting matters more than you think. Our process boils down to three questions:

  • Who is your agent?
  • What exactly should they do?
  • How should they do it (with examples)? And here’s the hard truth: your first prompt will fail. So will your second. We’ve rewritten some prompts 15+ times. That iteration cycle is the real work. And when models change, as they inevitably will, we iterate again.

Takeaway: Budget for iteration. Prompting is not “set it and forget it.”

Lesson 3: Context Management: Strike the Balance

Context is the lifeblood of agents. Think of it as the knowledge an intern needs to function: company background, ICPs, sales methodology, tone guidelines, messaging frameworks. Without context, agents hallucinate; with too much, they forget.

In our low-code/no-code setup, we relied on static context libraries. For example:

  • ICP docs (who we sell to, their pain points)
  • Messaging architecture (value props, competitive positioning)
  • Tone guidelines (how we speak)

For voice agents, this balance becomes critical quickly. A 10-minute conversation can blow past context windows. We had to be surgical about what context to include and when.

Takeaway: Context wins or loses the deployment. Build lean but comprehensive libraries, and prune often.

Lesson 4: Guardrails: They are not optional

Deploying AI agents without proper guardrails is like giving someone a car without brakes. You might get where you’re going, but the journey will be terrifying.

Essential Guardrails for GTM Agents

  • Content controls (prevent off-brand or inappropriate responses)
  • Info security (agents don’t access revenue numbers or strategy docs)
  • Brand protection (follow tone rules, avoid competitor bashing, don’t overpromising)
  • Conversation boundaries (know when to escalate to a human)

Takeaway: Guardrails protect customers, the brand, and the business. Treat them as launch requirements, not add-ons.

Lesson 5: Evaluations: Success doesn’t start at launch

Agents don’t fail at launch. They fail when no one tracks whether they’re actually working.

Evaluation frameworks need to account for:

  • Task completion rates: Did the agent achieve the intended outcome?
  • Conversation quality: Was the interaction natural and helpful?
  • Escalation appropriateness: When agents handed off to humans, was it necessary?
  • Information accuracy: Were facts and details correct throughout?
  • Brand consistency: Did the agent maintain our voice and values?

Also, remember: people treat AI differently than humans. They test it, push it, even try to break it. (My kid tried to order a pizza from our POC agent. Of course, that wasn’t in scope, but the agent deflected it well and brought back the conversation to what it was supposed to be . I’m not sure a “normal” evaluation would have caught that.)

Takeaway: Traditional CSAT/NPS won’t cut it. Build evaluation frameworks tailored to AI.

Lesson 6: Agents Without Tools Are Expensive Chatbots

The magic comes when agents can act. Start simple with agents that just talk. Then layer in:

  • CRM integration (auto-create leads, update records)
  • Calendar management (book meetings, send invites)
  • Knowledge base access (accurate answers, fewer escalations)
  • Communication tools (send follow-ups, trigger nurture flows)

Takeaway: Tools are how AI drives ROI. Talking alone doesn’t move the business.

Lesson 7: Multiple agents: Squads work better

Trying to make one agent do everything is a recipe for mediocrity. Squads (Vapi’s term) of specialized agents outperform generalists.

Why?

  • Each agent stays expert in its domain
  • Context windows stay manageable
  • Escalation paths are clearer
  • Updates are simpler

Takeaway: Think teams, not superheroes. Squads scale better._

Lesson 8: User Management: Don’t Skip Governance

Rolling out agents across GTM isn’t just technical. It’s organizational. Key elements to consider:

  • Role-based permissions (sales vs CSM vs support)
  • Mandatory training (how to use, when to escalate)
  • Usage monitoring (spot champions, flag misuse)
  • Regular reviews (keep agents aligned with strategy)

Takeaway: Governance matters. Without it, adoption collapse. Or worse, risk explodes.

Bringing It All Together

After a year of deployments, here’s my conclusion: AI agents are transformative, but only if you get the fundamentals right.

Key lessons:

  • Start with specific outcomes, not “AI would be cool here.”
  • Invest in context libraries early. It pays forever.
  • Build specialized agents with workflows, not generalists.
  • Plan for evaluation and iteration from day one.
  • Launch with guardrails and access controls in place.

The tools are ready, the infrastructure exists, and the competitive advantages are real. The only question is speed: Will your team figure this out first or will you be playing catch-up?

Related Posts

There are no related posts yet. 😢
Pull to refresh
Previous
Next
Swipe detected
Loading...